Tie vs. Opensend · Identity resolution, compared honestly

Opensend finds the visitor.
Tie turns them into revenue.

Opensend and Tie start at the same line: both put a name and an email to the anonymous shoppers on your site. The difference is what happens next. Opensend hands you the email address. Tie enriches it with 200+ attributes, scores who is about to buy, lands the message in the Primary inbox, and proves the lift with a holdout.

2–5×

More emails identified on identical traffic, in a live 3-way head-to-head

200+

Tie Attributes on every identified shopper

$520K

Revenue recovered in 3 months from returning shoppers Klaviyo couldn’t see

Both name the anonymous shopper.

Roughly nine in ten people who visit your store leave without a trace. Opensend and Tie solve the same first problem: putting a name and an email to that anonymous traffic through a third-party identity graph. If you're running Opensend, you already know identification works. You also know, deep down, that it could be done better. The real question is, “how much revenue does each identity actually produce?” That’s decided by everything that happens after the email address.

Opensend
TieIdentify → Enrich → Predict → Place
Opensend + Tie
1

Identify

Anonymous visitor to email address

Turn anonymous traffic into a named, emailable shopper. This is the whole job for an identity feed, and where Opensend stops.

Tie only
2

EnrichTie ID

200+ Tie Attributes per shopper

Attach 200+ demographic attributes so the shopper is segmentable, not just contactable.

Tie only
3

PredictTie Predict

Purchase-intent score, 1 to 10

Score who is actually ready to buy, before you send to them.

Tie only
4

PlaceTie Priority

Gmail Primary placement, reputation protection

Land the message in the Gmail Primary inbox and protect the sending domain, so the identity converts.

Opensend stops here
More revenue from fewer sendsSame list · same creative

The send-everyone baseline versus Tie Predict, which messages only the shoppers scored ready to buy — same list, same creative, same ESP. Based on Tie's public Sharper Image case study.

Opensend — send the whole listTie Predict — send only shoppers ready to buy
Emails sentTie sends 22% fewer
Opensendthe whole list
Tie−22%
RevenueTie drives 10% more
Opensendbaseline
Tie+10%
22% feweremails sent
+10%revenue per campaign
+36%click-through rate
+17%open rate

More sends doesn’t mean more revenue.

An identified list has no read on who is actually ready to buy, so a pure ID tool leaves you with one move: send to everyone. The shoppers who aren’t in the market get tired of the emails, unsubscribe, or report spam — your list shrinks and your sending reputation takes the hit. Tie Predict scores every identified shopper by purchase intent, per campaign, so you send only to the ones ready to buy. Sharper Image did exactly that: same list, same creative, fewer sends, and more revenue.

The takeaway is the method, not just the number: before you renew any identity tool, ask how it decides who to email, not just how many names it can find. Run Tie Predict alongside your current setup and check the receipts in your own Klaviyo. Nothing to rip out to find out.

The email address is where Tie starts.

An identified shopper is raw material. What turns them into revenue is the three layers an ID-only tool does not ship: depth to segment on, prediction to prioritize, and placement to convert. Each one below is a live customer result.

Tie ID · Who's my shopper?

200+ attributes, not 40 data points.

A pure ID tool returns an email and maybe a handful of fields. Tie attaches 200+ Tie Attributes to every identified shopper: demographics, financial and property signals, purchasing behavior, interests. Enough to segment and personalize, not just to send.

200+

Tie Attributes per identified shopper

Tie Predict · Who's ready to engage?

Who’s about to buy, before you send.

Portland Leather Goods was seeing diminishing returns from sending more emails. Tie Predict helped them focus their sends on the shoppers ready to buy now, and campaign revenue increased by 18%.

+18%

revenue per campaign

Tie Priority · Are my emails seen?

Identified is not delivered.

OluKai was doing everything right on deliverability and still landed in Promotions. Tie Priority moved their sends to the Gmail Primary inbox in 24 hours. Across 9 A/B tests, the protected variant lifted revenue per send 55% and click-through 42%, adding $55K+ in one test window.

+55%

revenue per send

+42%

click-through rate

Beekman 1802

Same identity. More revenue, and a holdout to prove it.

Beekman 1802 didn’t need more visitors. They needed to do more with the ones they already had. Tie surfaced 100K+ returning shoppers Klaviyo was treating as strangers and routed them back into existing flows, without touching deliverability.

These numbers are measured against a holdout, not credited by attribution.

Not every identified shopper who later buys was caused to buy by the identification. A holdout is the only way to tell attribution from lift: hold a control group back, and measure the net-new revenue the identified group produced that the control did not. Tie's proof of value is a holdout-based incrementality report, not a self-reported revenue estimate. Before you renew any identity tool, ask how its revenue number was measured.

$520,947

net revenue recovered in 3 months

4,754

new orders from reactivated profiles

108,647

returning shoppers reactivated

Opensend finds visitors. Tie finds buyers.

Both put a name to your anonymous traffic. Only Tie turns that name into a scored, enriched, deliverable, revenue-proven shopper. Here’s the boundary between the two.

Tie

Identity, turned into revenue

  • Tie Predict scores who’s ready to buy before you send, using forward-looking intent
  • Tie Priority lands the message in Gmail Primary and guards domain reputation
  • 200+ Tie Attributes per shopper, segmentation-grade depth on the Tie ID foundation
  • Recognizes returning shoppers across devices, revenue Klaviyo alone cannot see
  • Proof is a holdout-based incrementality report, net-new revenue, not an estimate
  • One platform, identity, enrichment, scoring and placement on a single graph; Klaviyo Preferred partner
vs

Opensend

Visitor identification

  • Identifies the visitor and returns the email address, then stops there
  • No purchase-intent scoring, you sort the list on engagement yourself in Klaviyo
  • No inbox-placement layer, identified doesn’t mean messages land in Primary
  • Revenue reported as an attribution estimate, not measured against a holdout
  • A point solution for one job: identity only
  • Not a Klaviyo partner

If you're already using Opensend, you've done the hard part. You believe in identification. The upgrade is everything after it.

Score who's ready, enrich for better segmentation, place so it lands, prove it with a holdout. Run Tie alongside your current setup on the same traffic and compare on your own numbers. Nothing to rip out to find out.

Identity is the start. Revenue is the point.

Opensend gets you the email address. Tie tells you who’s ready to buy, lands it in the inbox, recognizes the shoppers you are already losing, and proves the lift with a holdout, on the same identity you are already paying to find.

2–5×

more emails on identical traffic, in a live head-to-head

$520K

recovered in 3 months from shoppers Klaviyo could not see

+55%

revenue per send from the Primary inbox